On 7 September, the Ethereum Foundation’s Protocol Cluster published a tier list evaluating 62 EIPs proposed for the Hegotá upgrade. The post describes a consolidated view from contributing protocol teams and experts; it is useful roadmap evidence, but it does not declare that all 62 proposals will ship or set a final network-wide specification. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
Follow the evidence
Trace how the event could reach markets, then inspect a competing explanation.
Compare explanations
Switch lenses to see what each account explains—and what remains uncertain.
A shared tier list gives users a more legible view of how a protocol contributor group prioritizes candidate EIPs.
A shared tier list gives users a more legible view of how a protocol contributor group prioritizes candidate EIPs.
The proposals still depend on technical readiness, client implementation and broader protocol coordination before they become part of a live upgrade.
The Foundation group combined expert assessments into one view
The Protocol Cluster says it evaluated 62 EIPs proposed for Hegotá and published one unified view rather than separate per-team opinions. Sixteen contribution templates were submitted; twelve contributors provided tier grades, resulting in 397 grades across the proposals. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
Contributors used tiers from S through D/DFI, with numeric values for averaging. The post says the final tiers began with those grades but were then debated proposal by proposal in a working session. Some proposals received fewer grades because contributors assessed only topics within their expertise. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
The cluster says it worked with about 60 people across research and engineering, while noting that Geth would still publish its own standalone tier list. That detail matters: the post is a coordinated input to protocol planning, not a binding public ballot or confirmation that every candidate is included. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
Published trade-offs can make the roadmap easier to inspect
A common scoring framework gives developers and users more visibility into how priorities were discussed. It also exposes the engineering constraints the cluster says it learned from earlier work: integration depth, complexity and the available testing surface can affect delivery risk. The document offers process context, not a guarantee of timing. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
The companion priorities post outlines a longer-term protocol plan, including post-quantum readiness milestones. It describes a target schedule and calls the cadence aggressive, while acknowledging uncertainty around fork order, client capacity and research. Those are the Foundation group’s planning assumptions, not fixed delivery dates for all clients. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: current and emerging priorities
For crypto users, an upgrade roadmap matters through client implementation, wallet and application compatibility, security review and eventual activation. A proposal on a tier list is still subject to technical work and coordination. Traders should not treat a candidate EIP as an implemented feature or a guaranteed market catalyst.
Watch for scope decisions, test networks and client releases
The next useful evidence is a record of which EIPs enter the agreed fork scope, followed by test-network deployments, client releases and any formal activation process. Read tier labels alongside their accompanying notes instead of reducing a complex proposal to a single grade.
Compare the Foundation cluster’s assessment with independent client-team publications and later protocol coordination records. The cluster itself says Geth will have a separate tier list, which can reveal where implementation assessments converge or differ. Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster: Hegotá EIP opinion post and tier list
An alternative interpretation is that a tier list documents discussion rather than consensus. Until scope and activation are confirmed through Ethereum’s coordination process, describe the proposals as candidates. This distinction keeps development status separate from claims about what the network can do today.