Working Paper 1380 studies gold returns across changing financial environments. Its result is conditional, rather than a promise that every geopolitical shock produces the same price move.

What the primary record establishes

BIS Working Paper 1380 carries an October 2026 cover and a manuscript dated 22 September. Using monthly data from 1990 to 2026, the authors find that higher geopolitical risk raises gold returns more strongly when financial conditions are loose. BIS Working Paper 1380 — Chasing El Dorado, October 2026 ↗

They examine credit-and-liquidity and opportunity-cost channels, finding clearer evidence for the former. The publication states that its authors’ views need not represent the BIS or member central banks. It is an empirical study, not an official gold-price target. BIS Working Paper 1380 — Chasing El Dorado, October 2026 ↗

What the distinction changes

WFN’s interpretation is that a geopolitical headline needs a financing context. An estimated relationship conditional on liquidity cannot be turned into a universal rule about the next trading session.

Monthly research evidence also has a different horizon from an intraday quotation. Applying its result to a leveraged short-term position would require additional assumptions about timing, execution and exposure.

What to check before drawing a conclusion

When citing the work, retain the sample period and its conditional wording. Do not describe a historical estimated response as a guaranteed hedge for every investor or account currency.

A subsequent market report would need actual prices and dated observations of financial conditions. This article explains what the research establishes and where WFN’s interpretation begins, without forecasting a trade or presenting the paper as a central-bank recommendation.