In 2026, leading oil executives warn that removing 8–10 million barrels per day from global supply and disrupting up to 20% of LNG trade could trigger prolonged high energy prices, fuel shortages, and cascading economic effects across Asia, Europe, and emerging markets.

The global energy market is entering one of its most unstable phases in decades. Statements from top oil and gas executives at the CERAWeek reveal a growing gap between market pricing and physical supply realities. While futures markets remain reactive to headlines, industry leaders emphasize a more structural and prolonged disruption driven by the Iran conflict.

Supply shock larger than markets anticipate

Executives across the industry consistently point to one core issue: the scale of disruption is underestimated. According to Ryan Lance of ConocoPhillips, the removal of millions of barrels per day from global supply is not a short-term imbalance but a systemic shock.
“You just can’t take 8 to 10 million barrels a day… off the world stage without significant repercussions,” he stated, highlighting the structural deficit forming in global energy markets.

This view is reinforced by the closure of critical transit routes, particularly the Strait of Hormuz, which functions as a central artery for oil and LNG exports from the Gulf region.

Strait of Hormuz disruption as a systemic risk

The Strait of Hormuz is responsible for a significant portion of global energy flows. Its disruption creates immediate bottlenecks in supply chains.
Sheikh Nawaf al-Sabah of Kuwait Petroleum Corporation described the situation as an economic blockade affecting not just the region but the global economy.
The implication is clear: this is no longer a regional conflict. It is a global supply shock with direct consequences for fuel availability, pricing, and logistics.

Energy flows are not easily rerouted. Infrastructure limitations and geopolitical constraints mean that lost volumes cannot be quickly replaced.

Fuel shortages: Asia first, Europe next

One of the most immediate consequences highlighted by executives is the disruption in refined products. Shortages of jet fuel, diesel, and gasoline are already spreading across Asia and are expected to reach Europe within weeks.
This reflects a key structural issue: refining capacity and distribution networks are tightly interconnected. When upstream supply is disrupted, downstream effects propagate rapidly.

The timing is critical. Europe, already managing energy transition pressures and supply diversification challenges, faces additional strain as inventories decline.

Oil prices: why they are unlikely to fall soon

Despite periodic market optimism linked to diplomatic signals, industry leaders expect oil prices to remain elevated even if the conflict de-escalates.
Wael Sawan of Shell emphasized the disconnect between market perception and physical supply: “It’s physical flows that matter.”
This perspective is crucial. Futures markets react to expectations, but physical shortages determine long-term pricing. Even in a post-conflict scenario, countries will need to rebuild depleted reserves, sustaining demand pressure.
As of March 2026, U.S. crude prices have surged close to $100 per barrel, while Brent has exceeded $110, reflecting both supply constraints and geopolitical risk premiums.

LNG disruption and energy security concerns

The impact extends beyond oil. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) markets are also under pressure, with key export hubs affected by the conflict.
Attacks on infrastructure in Qatar have forced operational shutdowns, highlighting vulnerabilities in global energy systems. LNG plays a critical role in electricity generation and industrial activity, particularly in Asia and Europe.

The loss of LNG supply intensifies competition for available resources, driving prices higher and increasing volatility.

Historical comparison: echoes of the 1973 oil crisis

Industry analysts draw parallels with the 1973 oil embargo, one of the most significant energy shocks in modern history.
Paul Sankey described the current situation as potentially the most severe disruption since that period. The key similarity lies in supply constraints combined with geopolitical tensions.
However, today’s globalized economy amplifies the impact. Supply chains are more interconnected, and energy demand is higher, increasing systemic risk.

Security experts warn that escalation remains a significant risk. A prolonged conflict could destabilize Gulf economies, which are central to global energy supply.
The economic consequences extend beyond energy markets. Higher fuel costs increase transportation expenses, manufacturing costs, and inflationary pressures across economies.
Emerging markets are particularly vulnerable, as they face higher import costs and currency pressure.

Market disconnect: perception vs reality

A recurring theme among executives is the disconnect between market pricing and actual supply conditions.
Mike Wirth of Chevron noted that markets are reacting to “scant information” and perception rather than fundamentals.
This creates volatility. Prices fluctuate based on news flow, while underlying supply constraints remain unresolved.
For traders and investors, this environment requires a focus on physical market indicators rather than short-term sentiment.

For market participants, the current environment presents both risks and opportunities. Elevated volatility increases trading potential but also amplifies risk.
Energy markets are likely to remain sensitive to geopolitical developments, requiring close monitoring of supply data, inventory levels, and transport routes.
Currencies of energy-exporting countries may strengthen, while import-dependent economies face pressure.

The message from oil industry leaders is clear: the Iran war has triggered a structural energy shock that markets have yet to fully price in. With disrupted supply chains, constrained physical flows, and ongoing geopolitical risks, the outlook points to sustained high energy prices and increased volatility. For traders, investors, and policymakers, understanding the difference between market perception and physical reality is critical in navigating this evolving crisis.

Written by Ethan Blake
Independent researcher, fintech consultant, and market analyst.
March 30, 2026

Join us. Our Telegram: @forexturnkey
All to the point, no ads. A channel that doesn't tire you out, but pumps you up.