A risk plan is most useful before a difficult market arrives. It makes the limits, assumptions and actions visible while there is still time to reconsider exposure.

Follow the evidence

Trace how the event could reach markets, then inspect a competing explanation.

A risk plan is most useful before a difficult market arrives. It makes the limits, assumptions and actions visible while there is still time to reconsider exposure.

Compare explanations

Switch lenses to see what each account explains—and what remains uncertain.

Use stress cases to reveal hidden dependencies

Review what happens if volatility expands, spreads widen, a price feed is interrupted or several markets move together. A stress case is a test of assumptions, not a prediction that the scenario will occur. Predefined responses can reduce improvisation, but they do not remove market or counterparty risk. The practical value is knowing who acts, which systems or limits are involved and where the evidence will be recorded.

Account risk can be broader than one open position

A plan can record the instrument, position size, stop or exit condition, margin use and maximum exposure across related positions. Correlated pairs or products may respond to the same event, so separate tickets can still share one risk driver.

A limit is only meaningful if its unit and time frame are clear. State whether it applies per position, across the portfolio or over a review period, and whether fees, gaps or currency conversion are included.

Use stress cases to reveal hidden dependencies

Review what happens if volatility expands, spreads widen, a price feed is interrupted or several markets move together. A stress case is a test of assumptions, not a prediction that the scenario will occur.

Predefined responses can reduce improvisation, but they do not remove market or counterparty risk. The practical value is knowing who acts, which systems or limits are involved and where the evidence will be recorded.

Judge a plan by how it behaves across changing conditions

Keep original decisions alongside changes made later. Review missed limits, data gaps and operational failures as well as price outcomes; otherwise, a lucky result can hide a fragile process.

A risk framework should fit the person, instrument and applicable rules. No generic percentage or checklist can establish that a product is appropriate for an individual.